Skip to content

NewTop Profit is live in beta — find your next flip while you sleep.

Blog

What is a group purchasing organization, and why did Amazon sellers never have one?

The hundred-year history of group purchasing, the economics of why account size sets price, and why the model never reached independent Amazon sellers.

3 min read

An old idea, not a new one

Group purchasing sounds like a modern invention. It is not. American farmers were organizing cooperative buying through the Grange in the 1870s, combining orders for seed and equipment to get prices no single farm could.

Retailers followed. Ace Hardware was founded in 1924 by a handful of Chicago store owners who bought together. The Independent Grocers Alliance formed in 1926 for the same reason. Both still exist, because the idea keeps working.

Hospitals turned it into an industry

The first hospital group purchasing organization was the Hospital Bureau of New York, founded in 1910. For decades the idea stayed regional. Then healthcare costs became a national problem in the 1970s, and hospital group purchasing began a steady rise that has not stopped since.

Today the model is close to universal in American healthcare. Surveys published by the industry's own trade association report that nearly every hospital in the country buys through at least one group contract. A single clinic and a thousand-bed system buy the same gloves. They do not pay the same price, unless the clinic buys through a group.

Grocery and hotels run on it too

Independent grocers survive next to national chains largely because cooperative wholesalers let them buy at chain-scale prices. Hotels arrived more recently. Avendra, a purchasing organization founded in 2001, negotiates for thousands of hotel properties that would otherwise each be a small account.

The pattern repeats in every industry it touches. Many small buyers, identical goods, prices set by account size. Where those three conditions exist, group purchasing eventually shows up.

Why account size prices differently than the product

The part that surprises people is that volume pricing is not really about the product. The product costs the supplier the same to make whether it ships to one buyer or a hundred.

What differs is the cost of the account. A supplier serving one large buyer runs one sales relationship, one credit check, one invoice stream, one forecast. Serving a hundred small buyers means a hundred of each, plus a hundred chances that the account quietly disappears. The large account is cheaper to serve per dollar sold, so its dollars buy more.

Then there is the negotiation itself. When a large account asks for a better price, walking away is a credible threat, and the supplier prices that in. When a small account asks, it usually is not. Same product, same cost of goods, different answer.

Why the model concentrated where it did

Group purchasing took hold in industries that had a natural place to organize. Hospitals had regional councils and trade associations. Grocers shared wholesalers and distribution routes. Hotel brands already sat above thousands of properties. In each case, an existing structure could collect the fragmented demand and present it as one account.

Amazon sellers had no such structure

Independent Amazon sellers are one of the most fragmented buying populations in commerce. Hundreds of thousands of small businesses buying the same freight lanes, the same prep services, the same software, the same packaging. And no structure ever collected them.

Part of it is rivalry. Sellers compete on listings and treat supplier relationships as trade secrets, so the instinct that protects an individual seller also blocks collective buying. Part of it is the industry that grew up around Amazon, which sells sellers software and coaching, not purchasing power. And part of it is that no single seller is large enough for a supplier's national accounts team to pursue, so nobody ever came asking.

What the model is worth

Published benchmarks for the group purchasing model put typical savings at 10 to 18 percent on the categories a group negotiates. That figure describes what the model achieves in industries where it is established. It is not a Local Margin result, because Local Margin is early and does not have results yet.

But the conditions the model needs are all present here. Many small buyers, identical services, prices set by account size. The model did not skip Amazon sellers because it does not fit. It skipped them because nobody had built it.

Where to go from here

The page at /what-is-a-gpo walks through the model itself, how sourcing works here, and what we will and will not claim while the group is still forming. If the history above made the idea make sense, that page shows what it looks like applied to Amazon sellers.